By Axel Gelfert
Covering latest literature and significant debates, A severe creation to Testimony discusses the epistemic prestige of testimony-based ideals, relates adjustments to proper advancements in different components and provides a serious point of view on present and destiny examine developments. Devoting area to either the purposes of social epistemology and the bigger conceptual problems with wisdom, Gelfert not just introduces the epistemology of testimony; he deals an up to date creation to epistemology. built with a mixture of research questions, examples, and recommendations for extra studying, scholars of latest epistemology will locate this a competent consultant to learning testimony as a resource of knowledge.
Read or Download A Critical Introduction to Testimony PDF
Best epistemology books
Within the preface to his "Philosophical Investigations" Ludwig Wittgenstein expresses pessimism concerning the tradition of his time and doubts to whether his principles will be understood in this type of time: 'I cause them to public with uncertain emotions. it's not most unlikely that it may fall to the lot of this paintings, in its poverty and within the darkness of this time, to convey mild into one mind or one other - yet, after all, it isn't likely'.
A few medical different types appear to correspond to real positive factors of the area and are vital for profitable technology in a few area; briefly, they're typical forms . This booklet provides a basic account of what it's to be a normal sort and places the account to paintings illuminating quite a few particular examples.
Goldman and His Critics provides a chain of unique essays contributed via influential philosophers who significantly research Alvin Goldman’s paintings, through Goldman’s responses to every essay. reviews Alvin Goldman’s groundbreaking theories, writings, and ideas on various philosophical themes gains contributions from one of the most very important and influential modern philosophers Covers Goldman’s perspectives on epistemology—both person and social—in addition to cognitive technological know-how and metaphysics will pay specified realization to Goldman’s writings on philosophy of brain, together with the evolution of his innovations on Simulation-Theory (ST)
- The Soul of the Marionette: A Short Enquiry into Human Freedom
- Epistemic Relativism: A Constructive Critique
- Seeing, Doing, and Knowing
- W. V. Quine (Philosophy Now)
- Vom Denken der Natur zur Natur des Denkens. Ibn Bāǧǧas Theorie der Potenz als Grundlegung der Psychologie
Extra info for A Critical Introduction to Testimony
Acceptance and rejection, unfortunately, are only imperfectly correlated with the truth or falsity of the testimonial claim in question – if we were perfect ‘truth-detectors’, there would be no epistemological problem of testimony in the first place. Instead, we are well aware that we sometimes erroneously reject perfectly valid testimony, whereas on other occasions we take on trust testimony which – intentionally or not – is false. The general question arising from our epistemic predicament – which balance to strike between belief expansion and error avoidance – in the case of testimony becomes the challenge of striking the right balance between testimonial acceptance and rejection.
This suggests that a 34 A CRITICAL INTRODUCTION TO TESTIMONY workable definition of testimony – one that is true to our intuitions about what properly constitutes testimonial acts of communication, and is at the same time informative – is to be found somewhere in the middle. There is, of course, no guarantee that any single set of conditions will successfully delineate the category of testimony – our intuitions about what is, and is not, testimony might simply be too volatile, or different people might have divergent views on whether a particular example is, or is not, an instance of testimony, or testimony might turn out not to be a unitary category at all.
Graham 1997: 227) In essence, the moderate view weakens the strict conditions of the narrow view by relativizing them to the speaker’s beliefs and intentions: no longer does S ’s act of stating that p have to stand in an objective evidentiary relationship, it only needs to be offered as such; in a similar move, the demand for objective competence, authority or credentials on the part of the speaker has been replaced by S ’s intention to be perceived as competent, authoritative and credible by his audience.
A Critical Introduction to Testimony by Axel Gelfert